Ok, I said it...there will be a set of Dojo-Domino widgets available here in the next few days
Category Lotusphere2008 Gurupalooza
Bookmark :
Bookmark :
I couldn't resist and opened my big mouth at Gurupalooza. We'll publish our beta set of Dojomino widgets, and they will be freely available and open source. They are beta at this point and need a "lotus 2.0" theme which we'll continue to work on. We've been working quietly in the background on the Dojomino view widget for some time and there are a couple of things we want to clean up, but keep your eyes here as we'll be posting something very soon!


Comments
I also enjoyed your NSFDB2 session as it's something we're very interested in doing in the the near future.
Posted by Darren Oliver At 09:04:22 AM On 01/24/2008 | - Website - |
You mentioned something about speaking at another conference and comparing your dojo/domino stuff to Ext.nd and we wanted to see how we could help. Email me and let me know what we can do to help out in this.
Posted by Jack Ratcliff At 04:44:18 AM On 01/26/2008 | - Website - |
Posted by Patrick Kwinten At 08:32:33 PM On 01/24/2008 | - Website - |
Darn, I would have loved to talk through this with you. I did mention it to Nathan and he was pointing me your way.
In short, my goal is NOT to paint a picture of "this one is good" or "this one is bad". In fact, it's really to point out that you can do great things with both, that they have a lot of similarities in the grand scheme of things, and that in 8.5 you should have some choices for what you'll implement.
I'll ping you with an email to let you know specifically what I had in mind.
- Lance
Posted by Lance Spellman At 03:39:28 PM On 01/27/2008 | - Website - |
Posted by diego ogniben At 10:14:14 PM On 03/11/2008 | - Website - |
Yes, I should have put that in the post and will follow up on that.
@Patrick,
The design goal for all of our widgets is to make them exceptionally simple to implement. For each of them, we've considered the types of parameters that the developer might want while providing default values for those parameters so you don't have to include them at all if you don't want to.
As an example, let's take a name picker (we have both a single name picker widget and a multi-name picker widget). You select which widget to apply to a names field and that would be it. However, you'd also have the following optional parameters you could apply:
directory="mydirectory.nsf"
lookupPeople="true"
lookupGroups="false"
lookupPeopleAndGroups="false"
peopleView="($VIMPeople)"
groupsView="($VIMGroups)"
If you don't provide any of those parameters, we'll use the default directory (as the server reports it), do lookupPeople only, and use the default view for person lookups.
If you provide parameters with different values, we'll use them.
All these parameters are simply added in the HTMLAttributes formula of the Notes field you want to apply the widget to. That's it.
Posted by Lance Spellman At 01:43:36 AM On 01/25/2008 | - Website - |
Yes, I'm excited to see exactly what Victor has done, and I'm really looking forward to collaborating on it.
Posted by Lance Spellman At 10:57:58 AM On 01/25/2008 | - Website - |